Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03925
Original file (BC 2007 03925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-03925
      INDEX CODE:  107.00
	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX			COUNSEL: NONE

								HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Armed Forces 
Service Medal (AFSM).
________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received the AFSM for his participation in OPERATION JOINT 
FORGE when he was sent on temporary duty (TDY) to San Vito Dei 
Normanni Air Station (AS), Italy, from 3 November 1998 to 
16 December 1998.  He is trying to enter the field of law 
enforcement and he would like the medal to appear on his DD Form 
214.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of 
his DD Form 214 and an AFSM certificate.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 9 October 1996, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air 
Force at the age of 23 in the rank of airman first class (E-3).  
He was promoted to the rank of senior airman (E-4) effective and 
with a date of rank of 9 August 1998.  

On 30 June 1999, the applicant was honorably released from 
active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.  He was 
credited with 2 years, 8 months, and 22 days of active duty 
service.  His DD Form 214 reflects no foreign service, and that 
he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon and Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award.  

________________________________________________________________
_



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denying the applicant’s request.  DPAPP 
states that a review of his master personnel records failed to 
provide any documents to substantiate he served TDY at San Vito 
AS, or that he had any foreign or overseas service.  The alleged 
period of TDY would have been performed while the applicant was 
assigned to the xx Supply Squadron, Hurlburt Field, Florida.  A 
check with the Defense Accounting and Finance Service (DFAS) 
revealed there was no record of any combat zone, TDY support, or 
anything on his pay account.  A further check with the Air Force 
Historical Agency failed to produce any information or 
documentation that could verify the TDY in question.  DPAPP 
asked the applicant to make one last check of his personal 
documents for evidence of his TDY; however, he did not respond.   

The DPAPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.  

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denying the applicant’s request for the 
AFSM.  DPSIDR states that the AFSM is awarded to members of the 
Armed Forces of the United States who, after 1 June 1992, (1) 
participate, or have participated, as members of U.S. military 
units, in a U.S. military operation that is deemed to be a 
significant activity by the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and (2) 
encounter no foreign armed opposition or imminent threat of 
hostile action.  Following a review of the applicant’s records, 
they find no evidence to verify the applicant was ever TDY 
outside of the United States.  

The DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 June 2008 for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence 
the individual is eligible for the award of the AFSM.  We note 
the applicant submitted a copy of an AFSM certificate; however, 
he did not provide any official documentary evidence, i.e., 
travel orders, travel voucher, or a corroborating witness 
statement, to substantiate his claim.  There is no indication in 
his records that he was deployed to San Vito Dei Normanni AS, 
Italy, in support of OPERATION JOINT FORGE, or that he was 
recommended for, or awarded, the AFSM.  In the absence of such 
evidence we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application.  Therefore, we agree with the 
opinions and recommendations from the Air Force offices of 
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis 
for our decision that the applicant is not a victim of error or 
injustice in regard to award of the AFSM.  In view of the above, 
we find no basis to favorably consider this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 7 August 2008, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
			XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
			XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-03925:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Oct 07, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 2 Jun 2008, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 17 Jun 2008.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jun 2008.




                                   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04662

    Original file (BC-2011-04662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Although he was overseas in Italy during the appropriate time frame for entitlement to the AFEM for Operation JOINT FORGE, his military personnel records and provided documentation are devoid of evidence to support claim of his presence in the designated AOE, thereby rendering the applicant ineligible for the AFEM. While the applicant states he served directly on the coast of the Adriatic Sea, he has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01860

    Original file (BC-2009-01860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM) 3. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SWASM and the AFSM. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01357

    Original file (BC-2005-01357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01357 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 NOVEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for her service in support of Operation ELDORADO CANYON. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02110

    Original file (BC-2012-02110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on a review of the applicant's military personnel record and provided documentation; he did not serve in the Areas of Eligibility (AOE) for award of the AFEM. Service members must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that participated in or engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00162

    Original file (BC 2008 00162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for the time he served, 1 November 1961 through 7 July 1965, in Saigon with the XXXXX Air Police Squadron. DPAPP states the applicant’s DD Form 214 does reflect his award of the AFEM, but there are no documents in his records that confirm any Vietnam service. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02837

    Original file (BC-2007-02837.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02837 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam, and entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02920

    Original file (BC-2007-02920.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records reflect he enlisted on active duty on 29 April 1961. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant's military records, they are unable to verify the applicant was in Vietnam. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01595

    Original file (BC-2008-01595.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a thorough review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records failed to provide any document that substantiated any time in Vietnam. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify the applicant was in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01284

    Original file (BC-2012-01284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01284 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 9 Jul 63 to 7 Jul 67. There was...